In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art

In the Blink of an Ear Toward a Non Cochlear Sonic Art An ear opening reassessment of sonic art from World War II to the presentMarcel Duchamp famously championed a non retinal visual art rejecting judgments of taste and beauty In the Blink of an Ear is

  • Title: In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art
  • Author: Seth Kim-Cohen
  • ISBN: 9780826429711
  • Page: 472
  • Format: Paperback
  • An ear opening reassessment of sonic art from World War II to the presentMarcel Duchamp famously championed a non retinal visual art, rejecting judgments of taste and beauty In the Blink of an Ear is the first book to ask why the sonic arts did not experience a parallel turn toward a non cochlear sonic art, imagined as both a response and a complement to Duchamp s conceAn ear opening reassessment of sonic art from World War II to the presentMarcel Duchamp famously championed a non retinal visual art, rejecting judgments of taste and beauty In the Blink of an Ear is the first book to ask why the sonic arts did not experience a parallel turn toward a non cochlear sonic art, imagined as both a response and a complement to Duchamp s conceptualism Rather than treat sound art as an artistic practice unto itself or as the unwanted child of music artist and theorist Seth Kim Cohen relates the post War sonic arts to contemporaneous movements in the gallery arts Applying key ideas from poststructuralism, deconstruction, and art history, In the Blink of an Ear suggests that the sonic arts have been subject to the same cultural pressures that have shaped minimalism, conceptualism, appropriation, and relational aesthetics Sonic practice and theory have downplayed or, in many cases, completely rejected the de formalization of the artwork and its simultaneous animation in the conceptual realm Starting in 1948, the simultaneous examples of John Cage and Pierre Schaeffer initiated a sonic theory in practice, fusing clement Greenberg s media specificity with a phenomenological emphasis on perception Subsequently, the sound in itself tendency has become the dominant paradigm for the production and reception of sound art Engaged with critical texts by Jacques Derrida, Rosalind Krauss, Friedrich Kittler, Jean Fran ois Lyotard, and Jacques Attali, among others, Seth Kim Cohen convincingly argues for a reassessment of the short history of sound art, rejecting sound in itself in favor of a reading of sound s expanded situation and its uncontainable textuality At the same time, this important book establishes the principles for a nascent non cochlear sonic practice, embracing the inevitable interaction of sound with the social, the linguistic, the philosophical, the political, and the technological.Artists discussed include George BrechtJohn CageJanet CardiffMarcel Duchamp Bob DylanValie ExportLuc FerrariJarrod FowlerJacob KirkegaardAlvin LucierRobert MorrisMuddy WatersJohn Oswald Marina Rosenfeld Pierre Schaeffer Stephen Vitiello La Monte Young

    One thought on “In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art”

    1. This has to be the single worse book on sound art I have ever read. It reminds me of the sort of book written by someone who is driven by a set of prejudices the foundations of which they themselves do not fully understand. There is a kneejerk reaction against phenomenology that claims to come from a commitment to post-structuralism when, in fact, the truth of the story is far more complex than a sort of absurdly simplistic reaction where Husserl=bad. Even when Kim-Cohen attempts to say Merlea-P [...]

    2. The author comes at sound art through visual art, specifically minimalism and conceptualism, which gives him a distinct perspective. Once you get through a difficult and rather dry chapter on same, Kim-Cohen will reward you with the clearest, most cogent readings of John Cage I have come across, along within insights into other important sound artists. Be aware that he is most concerned with those working in the conceptual realm he brands "non-cochlear". Once this thesis and limited scope is tak [...]

    3. Academic text that appears to be in the same realm of research I'm interested in with A/V performance. So far I *love* his point that descriptors for art are mainly from the visual realm. In his intro he points out the the ear doesn't blink. It remains an open channel/receptor into our brains. My thesis made an argument along these lines: that critical models based solely in the visual realm are inadequate for considering interdisciplinary work. Seems pretty obvious, yeah?I should also mention t [...]

    4. This is a book that is useful for researchers thinking about and through sonic media. It can be the basis and foundation for further theorizations of sound. I found the book solid, but under-developed. Having said that, there are some very significant statements, concepts and interpretations introduced by Kim-Cohen.It is worth reading by specialists in this field and is a productive text. For those without already existing expertise in sonic media, I would look elsewhere.

    5. I think this a solid book to get bearings in critical social, historical and political discourse within sound works.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *